This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Vanderburg, W. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Can the University Escape From the Labyrinth of Technology? Part 4: Extending the Strategy to Medicine, the Social Sciences, and the University

University of Toronto

This fourth part outlines a strategy for overcoming the limitations of the knowledge system for engineering by combining intellectual maps, preventive approaches, umbrella concepts, and round tables as described in the earlier parts. A discussion of the issues faced by modern medicine illustrates the paradigmatic nature of the diagnosis and prescription made for engineering. The social sciences face mirror-image problems. One response has been the rise of new disciplines such as communications, environmental studies, urban affairs, criminology, and policy studies. To avoid the limitations of discipline-based knowing and doing, a similar strategy for their transformation will have to be implemented. Considerable synergies would result if parallel efforts to transform the present knowledge system were carried out throughout the university. Some suggestions are made as to how this can be supported by organizational and institutional changes. Finally, it is suggested that such a transformation of the university could make a critical and decisive contribution to overcoming the current economic, social, and environmental crises.

Key Words: intellectual division of labor • knowledge infrastructure • interdisciplinary knowledge • boundaries of disciplines and specialties • specialized knowledge • the university • round tables • central interfaculty • environmental crisis

Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 26, No. 3, 204-216 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0270467606289199


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. H. Vanderburg Rethinking Engineering Design and Decision Making in Response to Economic, Social, and Environmental Crises Bulletin of Science Technology Society, October 1, 2009; 29(5): 421 - 432. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. H. Vanderburg The Antieconomy Hypothesis (Part 1): From Wealth Creation to Wealth Extraction Bulletin of Science Technology Society, February 1, 2009; 29(1): 48 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. H. Vanderburg The Antieconomy Hypothesis (Part 2): Theoretical Roots Bulletin of Science Technology Society, February 1, 2009; 29(1): 57 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. H. Vanderburg The Antieconomy Hypothesis (Part 3): Toward a Solution Bulletin of Science Technology Society, February 1, 2009; 29(1): 66 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. H. Vanderburg The Most Economic, Socially Viable, and Environmentally Sustainable Alternative Energy Bulletin of Science Technology Society, April 1, 2008; 28(2): 98 - 104. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. H. Vanderburg The Knowledge Bluff Bulletin of Science Technology Society, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 401 - 407. [Abstract] [PDF]