Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Binks, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Are We Really the Prey? Nanotechnology as Science and Science Fiction

Diana M. Bowman

Monash University, Australia

Graeme A. Hodge

Monash University, Australia

Peter Binks

Nanotechnology Victoria, Australia

Popular culture can play a significant role in shaping the acceptance of evolving technologies, with nanotechnology likely to be a case in point. The most popular fiction work to date in this arena has been Michael Crichton's techno-thriller Prey, which fuses together nanotechnology science with science fiction. Within the context of Prey, this article examines the role that scientists and popular culture play in educating society, and one another, about emerging technologies. In di ferentiating fact from fiction, the article reflects on how such distinctions may be important in proactive public dialogue projects. The article concludes that popular culture will be a key factor in informing citizen beliefs about the coming nano-age. Accordingly, governments, in conjunction with the scientific community, will need to be proactive in distinguishing science fact from science fiction for the benefit of their citizens.

Key Words: nanotechnology • Prey • regulation • science fiction • popular culture

References

  • Altmann, J. (2001). Military uses of microsystem technologies: Dangers and preventative arms control. Munster, Germany: Agenda Verlag.
  • Altmann, J. (2005). Military nanotechnology: Potential applications and preventive arms control. London: Routledge.
  • ASN Nutrition. (2006). Making advances in athletic performance— Nanotechnology. Retrieved August 6, 2006, fromhttp://www.asn-nutrition.com
  • Balbus, J.M., Denison, R., Florini, K., & Walsh, S. (2005, Summer). Getting nanotechnology right the first time. Issues in Science and Technology, pp. 65-71.
  • Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (2002). Biotechnology: The making of a global controversy. London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baum, R. (2003). Nanotechnology: Drexler and Smalley make the case for and against "molecular assemblers." Chemical and Engineering News, 81(48), 37-42.
  • Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2004). Two cultures of nanotechnology? International Journal for Philosophy and Chemistry, 10(2), 65-82.
  • Berube, D.M., & Shipman, J.D. (2004, Winter). Denialism: Drexler vs. Roco. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, pp. 22-26.
  • Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Bonabeau, E., & Theraulaz, G. (2000). Swarm smart. Scientific American, 282(3), 72-79.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bond, P.J. (2004). Vision for converging technologies and future science. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1013, 17-24.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Boston, J. (1991). The theoretical underpininings of public sector restructuring in New Zealand. In J. Boston, J. Martin, J. Pallot, & P. Walsh (Eds.), Reshaping the state: New Zealand's bureaucratic revolution (pp. 1-26). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Bowman, D., & Hodge, G. (2006). Nanotechnology: Mapping the wild regulatory frontier. Futures, 38, 1060-1073.[CrossRef]
  • Bowman, D., & Hodge, G. (2007). A small matter of regulation: An international review of nanotechnology regulation. Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 8, 1-36.
  • Brenner, D.W., Sinnott, S.B., Harrison, J.A., & Shenderova, O.A. (1996). Simulated engineering of nanostructures. Nanotechnology, 7, 161-167.[CrossRef]
  • Canton, J. (2004). Designing the Future: NBIC Technologies and Human Performance Enhancement. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1013, 186-198.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Carver, J. (1989). From a changeling star. New York: Bantam Spectra.
  • Clemens, E.S. (1986). Of asteroids and dinosaurs: The role of the press in the shaping of scientific debate. Social Studies of Science, 16, 421-456.[Abstract]
  • Cobb, M.D. (2005). Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27(2), 221-239.[Abstract]
  • Cobb, M.D., & Macoubrie, J. (2004). Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 395-405.[CrossRef]
  • Colvin, V.L. (2003, April 9). Testimony of Dr Vicki L. Colvin before the US House of Representatives Committee on Science in regards to Nanotechnology Research and Development Act of 2003, Washington, DC.
  • Crichton, M. (2002). Prey. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Curad. (2006). Curad silver. Retrieved August 7, 2006, from http://www.curadusa.com
  • Curtis, S.A., Rilee, M.L., Clark, P.E., & Marr, G.C. (2003, July). Use of swarm intelligence in spacecraft constellations for the resource exploration of the Asteroid Belg. Paper presented at the Third International Workshop on Satellite Constellations and Formation Flying, Pisa, Italy.
  • Dick, P.K. (1953). Second variety. In D. G. Hartwell (Ed.). (1989). The world treasury of science fiction (pp. 804-843). Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Drexler, K.E. (1981). Molecular engineering: An approach to the development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS), 78(9), 5275-5278.
  • Drexler, K.E. (1986). Engines of creation: The coming era of nanotechnology. New York: Anchor Books.
  • Drexler, K.E. (1987a). Molecular machinery and molecular electronic devices. In F. L. Carter (Ed.), Molecular electronic devices II (pp. 549-571). New York: Dekker.
  • Drexler, K.E. (1987b). Nanomachinery: Atomically precise gears and bearings. Proceedings of the IEEE Micro Robot. Teleoperators Workshop, Hyannis, MA.
  • Drexler, K.E. (1988). Rod logic and thermal noise in the mechanical nanocomputer. In F. L. Carter, R. Siatkowski, & H. Wohltjen (Eds.), Molecular electronics (pp. 39-56). Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Drexler, K.E. (1991). Molecular tip arrays for molecular imaging and nanofabrication. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, B9, 1394-1397.
  • Drexler, K.E. (1992). Nanosystems: Molecular machinery, manufacturing and computation. New York: John Wiley.
  • Drexler, K.E. (2001). Machine-phase nanotechnology. Scientific American, 285(3), 74-75.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Drexler, K.E. (2003). Drexler open letter. Retrieved August 3, 2006, from http://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/8148/8148counterpoint.html
  • Drexler, K.E., Forrest, D., Freitas, R.A., Hall, J.S., Jacobstein, N., McKendree, T., et al. (2001). A debate about assemblers: On physics, fundamentals, and nanorobots: A rebuttal to Smalley's assertion that self-replicating mechanical nanorobots are simply not possible. Retrieved September 9, 2007, from www.imm.org/SciAmDebate2/smalley.html
  • Environmental Law Institute. (2005). Securing the promise of nanotechnology: Is U.S. environmental law up to the job? Washington, DC: Author.
  • Feynman, R. (1959). There's plenty of room at the bottom. Retrieved September 3, 2006, from http://www.its.caltech.edu/~feynman/
  • Fleming, N. (2006, May 5). Women buying creams made of tiny particles "used as guinea pigs." The Daily Telegraph (UK), p. 6.
  • Friedman, S.M., & Egolf, B.P. (2005, Winter). Nanotechnology: Risks and the media. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, pp. 5-11.
  • Gaskell, G., Ten Eyck, T., Jackson, J., & Veltri, G. (2005). Imagining nanotechnology: Cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States. Public Understanding of Science, 14(1), 81-90.[Abstract]
  • Glimell, H. (2004). Grand visions and Lilliput politics: Staging the exploration of the "endless frontier." In D. Baird, A. Nordmann, & J. Schummer (Eds.), Discovering the nanoscale (pp. 231-246). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Hawking, S. (1995). Foreword. In L. M. Krauss, The physics of Star Trek (pp. xi-xiii). New York: HarperCollins.
  • Heinlein, R.A. (1965). Waldo. In Three by Heinlein: The puppet master, Waldo, and Magic, Inc (pp. 217-326). New York: Doubleday. (Originally published 1942)
  • Ho, W., & Lee, J. (1999). Single bond formation and characterization with a scanning tunnel microscope. Science, 286, 1719-1722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Hodge, G.A. (2000). Privatization: An international review of performance. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Hodge, G., & Bowman, D. (2004). Governing nanotechnology: Setting the regulatory agenda. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 10(2), 18-33.
  • House of Lords, Select Committee on Science and Technology. (2000). Science and society (3rd report). London: United Kingdom Parliament.
  • Junk, A., & Riess, F. (2006). From an idea to a vision: There's plenty of room at the bottom. American Journal of Physics, 74(9), 825-830.
  • Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (IV), 1942-1948. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
  • Kurzweil, R. (2003). The Drexler-Smalley debate on molecular assembly. Retrieved from http://www.KurzweilAI.net
  • Lane, R. (1991). The market experience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Laurent, L., & Petit, J.-C. (2005). Nanosciences and its convergence with other technologies: New golden age or apocalypse?. International Journal for Philosophy and Chemistry, 11(1), 45-76.
  • Ludlum, R., & Larkin, P. (2004). The Lazarus vendetta. New York: St. Martin's.
  • Lux Research Inc. (2006). The nanotech report (4th ed., press release). New York: Author.
  • Macnaghten, P., Kearnes, M., & Wynne, B. (2005). Nanotechnology, governance and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences? Science Communication, 27(2), 268-291.[Abstract]
  • Marchant, G.E., & Sylvester, D.J. (2006). Transnational models for regulation of nanotechnology. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34(4), 714-725.[Free Full Text]
  • Market Attitudes Research Services. (2004). Short report: Australian community opinion towards nanotechnology and the commercialisation of scientific research. Canberra, Australia: Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources.
  • Marshall, J. (2002, December 16). Author Crichton ponders fear, real and imagined. Smalltimes. Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http://www.smalltimes.com
  • Maynard, A.D. (2006). Health and environmental safety of nanotechnology. Interview with Dr Andrew Maynard. Japan Nanonet Bulletin, 76, 1-2.
  • Mee, W., Lovel, R., Solomon, R., Kearns, A., Cameron, F., & Turney, T. (2004). Nanotechnology: The Bendigo workshop. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Minerals.
  • Merkle, R. (1997). A proposed "metabolism" for a hydrocarbon assembler. Nanotechnology, 8, 149-162.[CrossRef]
  • Merkle, R. (2000). Nanotechnology: Designs for the future. Ubiquity. Retrieved September 9, 2006, from http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/interview/r_merkle_1.html
  • Miksanek, T. (2001). Microscopic doctors and molecular black bags: Science fiction's prescription for nanotechnology and medicine. Literature and Medicine, 1, 55-70.
  • Milburn, C. (2002). Nanotechnology in the age of posthuman engineering: Science fiction as science. Configurations, 10, 261-295.[CrossRef]
  • Nanologue. (2005). Nanologue background paper—On selected nanotechnology applications and their ethical, legal and social implications. Wuppertal, Germany: Wuppertal Institute, EMPA, Forum of the Future and triple innova.
  • New Clancy novel arrives early, new push for "Prey." ( 2003). New York Daily News, May 6, p. 65.
  • Nordmann, A. (2004, Winter). Nanotechnology's worldview: New space for old cosmologies. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, pp. 48-54.
  • Ozin, G.A., Manners, I., Fournier-Bidoz, S., & Arsenault, A. (2005). Dream nanomachines. Advanced Materials, 17, 3011-3018.[CrossRef]
  • Peterson, C.L. (2004, Winter). Nanotechnology: From Feynman to the grand challenge of molecular manufacturing. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, pp. 9-15.
  • Phoenix, C. (2003). The need for immediate well-planned action. Brooklyn, NY: Center for Responsible Nanotechnology.
  • Powell, M.C., & Kanarek, M.S. (2006). Nanomaterial health effects—Part 1: Background and current knowledge. Wisconsin Medical Journal, 105(2), 16-20.
  • Roco, M.C. (2003). Broader societal issues of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5(2), 181-189.[CrossRef]
  • Roco, M.C. (2004). The US national nanotechnology initiative after 3 years (2001-2003). Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6, 1-10.[CrossRef]
  • Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.). (2001). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. New York: Springer.
  • Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.). (2002). Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive sciences. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
  • Rouff, C., Vanderbilt, A., Hinchey, M., Truszkowski, W., & Rash, J. (2004, September, China). Properties of a formal method for prediction of emergent behaviours in swarm-based systems. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, Beijing, China.
  • Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering. ( 2004). Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London: Author.
  • Samsung Australia. (2006). Silver nano health system—Silver nano products. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from http://www.samsung.com.au/silvernano/
  • Self, P. (1998). Public choice and public benefit: Politics, public service and markets. Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, 90, 113-114.
  • Sheetz, T., Vidal, J., Pearson, T.D., & Loranzo, K. (2005). Nanotechnology: Awareness and societal concerns. Technology in Society, 27, 329-345.[CrossRef]
  • Smalley, R. (2001). Of chemistry, love and nanobots. Scientific American, 285(3), 76-77.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Stephenson, N. (1996). The diamond age: Or, a young lady's illustrated primer. New York: Bantam Spectra.
  • Stretton, H., & Orchard, L. (1994). Public goods, Public enterprise, public choice: Theoretical foundations of the contemporary attack on government. New York: St. Martin's.
  • Toumey, C. (2004). Narratives for nanotech: Anticipating public reactions to nanotechnology. Techne, 8(2), 88-116.
  • Truszkowski, W., Hinchey, M., Rash, J., & Rouff, C. (2004, September/October). NASA's swarm missions: The challenge of building autonomous software. IT Pro, pp. 47-52.
  • Walch, S.P., Goddard, W.A., & Merkle, R. (1997, November). Theoretical studies of reactions on diamond surfaces. Paper presented at the Fifth Foresight Conference on Molecular Nanotechnology, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Whiteside, G.M. (2001). The once and future nanomachine. Scientific American, 285(3), 78-83.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Whiteside, G.M. (2003). The "right" size in nanobiotechnology. Nature Biotechnology, 21(9), 1161-1165.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. (2006). A nanotechnology consumer product inventory. Retrieved September 4, 2006, from http://www.nanotechproject.org/index.php?id=44&action=view

Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 27, No. 6, 435-445 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0270467607308282
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of Science Technology SocietyHome page
R. Gordon
Learning From Fiction: Applications in Emerging Technologies
Bulletin of Science Technology Society, December 1, 2009; 29(6): 470 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Binks, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?