Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanderburg, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 26, No. 3, 204-216 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0270467606289199
© 2006 SAGE Publications

Can the University Escape From the Labyrinth of Technology? Part 4: Extending the Strategy to Medicine, the Social Sciences, and the University

Willem H. Vanderburg

University of Toronto

This fourth part outlines a strategy for overcoming the limitations of the knowledge system for engineering by combining intellectual maps, preventive approaches, umbrella concepts, and round tables as described in the earlier parts. A discussion of the issues faced by modern medicine illustrates the paradigmatic nature of the diagnosis and prescription made for engineering. The social sciences face mirror-image problems. One response has been the rise of new disciplines such as communications, environmental studies, urban affairs, criminology, and policy studies. To avoid the limitations of discipline-based knowing and doing, a similar strategy for their transformation will have to be implemented. Considerable synergies would result if parallel efforts to transform the present knowledge system were carried out throughout the university. Some suggestions are made as to how this can be supported by organizational and institutional changes. Finally, it is suggested that such a transformation of the university could make a critical and decisive contribution to overcoming the current economic, social, and environmental crises.

Key Words: intellectual division of labor • knowledge infrastructure • interdisciplinary knowledge • boundaries of disciplines and specialties • specialized knowledge • the university • round tables • central interfaculty • environmental crisis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of Science Technology SocietyHome page
W. H. Vanderburg
The Most Economic, Socially Viable, and Environmentally Sustainable Alternative Energy
Bulletin of Science Technology Society, April 1, 2008; 28(2): 98 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of Science Technology SocietyHome page
W. H. Vanderburg
The Knowledge Bluff
Bulletin of Science Technology Society, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 401 - 407.
[Abstract] [PDF]